[参考文献]
[References]
[1]左然.国外中央政府机构设置研究[J].中国行政管理,2006(4).
Zuo Ran. Study on the Setting of the Foreign Central Government Agencies. Chinese Public Administration,2006 (4).
[2]宋世明.论大部门体制的基本构成要素[J].中国行政管理,2009(10).
Song Shiming. The Basic Elements of Super-ministry System. Chinese Public Administration,2009 (10).
[3]汪玉凯.冷静看待“大部制”改革[N].中国经济时报,2007-12-10.
Wang Yukai. Staying Calm to View the Super-ministry Reform. China Economic Times,2007-12-10.
[4]马英.大部制改革与政府职能的转变[J].云南行政学院学报,2008(4).
Ma Ying.The Super-ministry Reform and the Transformation of Government Functions. Journal of Yunnan Administration Institute,2008(4).
[5]白智立.日本行政改革比较研究[M].北京:国家行政学院出版社,2012.21.
Bai Zhili. A Comparative Study of the Administrative Reform in Japan. The CAG Press,2012.p21.
[6]杨敏.大部门体制的改革逻辑[J].决策,2007(11).
Yang Min. The Logic of Super-ministry Reform. The Decision,2007(11).
[7]中国共产党第十八届中央委员会第三次全体会议文件汇编[M].北京:人民出版社,2013.37.
Files of The Third Plenary Session of China Eighteenth CPC Central Committee. Beijing: The People’s Press,2013.p37.
[8]倪星.大部门体制:英法经验与中国视角[J].天津行政学院学报,2008(1).
Ni Xing. Super-ministry System: The British and French Experience and China’s Perspective. Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute,2008(1).
[9][美]罗伯特·达尔.公共行政科学:三个问题[M].彭和平等译.北京:中央党校出版社,1997.161.
Robert Dahl. The Science of Public Administration: Three Problems. Trans. by Peng Heping et al. The Publishing House of the Central Party School,1997.p161.
[10]李景鹏.权力政治学[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江教育出版社,1995.
Li Jingpeng. Power Politics. Heilongjiang Education Publishing House,1995.
[11]樊鹏.发达国家和地区大部门体制组织结构与运行机制比较[J].经济社会体制比较,2011(1).
Fan Peng. The Comparison of Super-ministry System Organizational Structures and Operating Mechanisms among Developed Countries and Regions. Comparative Studies of Economic and Social Systems,2011(1).
[12]竺乾威.国外大部门体制:推进方法和特点[N].经济日报,2008-02-29.
Zhu Qianwei. The Foreign Super-ministry System: The Propulsion Methods and Characteristics. Economic Daily, 2008-02-29.
Five misunderstandings about the reform of super-ministry system
Zhao ZijianSong Shiming
[Abstract]In the current discussion on the implementation of the Super-Ministry System, there are five misunderstandings of the nature. Based on the analysis and criticism of the misunderstandings, this paper presents that the nature of super-ministry system is the recombination of government structures and the reengineering of government operation mechanisms; promoting the construction of service government is the basic purpose of the implementation of the super-ministry system; interaction and mutual promotion are the basic relationship between the transformation of government functions and the implementation of super-ministry system; the propulsion mode must be the combination of the top design and the basic exploration ; China implementation of super-ministry system has its unique individuality.
[Key words]super-ministry system, government function, service-oriented government, top design
[Authors]Zhao Zijian is Postdoctoral of Chinese Academy of Governance; Song Shiming is Professor of Chinese Academy of Governance. Beijing 100089
已有0人发表了评论