参考文献：
Aizenman, Joshua; Jinjarak, Yothin; Park, Donghyun (2011): Capital Flows and Economic Growth in the Era of Financial Integration and Crisis,1990-2010. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 17502, October 2011.
Bhagwati, Jagdish (1998): The Capital Myth. The Difference between Trade in Widgets and Dollars. Foreign Affairs, Volume 77, No. 3 (May/June 1998), pp. 7-12.
Bordo, Michael; Eichengreen, Barry; Klingebiel, Daniela; Martinez-Peria, Maria Soledad; Rose, Andrew K. (2001): Is the crisis problem growing more severe? Economic Policy, Vol. 16, No. 32 (April 2001), pp. 53-82.
Brender, Anton; Pisani, Florence (2010): Global Imbalances and the Collapse of Globalised Finance. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, available at .
Buiter, William (2008): Why the United Kingdom should join the Eurozone. International Finance, Vol 11, No 3, pp. 269–282.
Dieter, Heribert; Higgott, Richard (2010): Managing global imbalances: Is it time to consider some form of sanctions? VoxEurope e-book, 23 June 2010, pp. 197-204, available at.
Eatwell, John (1997): International Financial Liberalization: The Impact on World Development. UNDP, Discussion Paper Series 12/1997.
Gu, Xinhua; Sheng, Li (2010): A sensible Tool for Pareto Improvement: Capitals Controls. Journal of World Trade, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 567-589.
Haldane, Andrew (2009): Rethinking the Financial Network. Speech by Andrew Haldane to the Financial Student association, Amsterdam, April 2009, available at
Held, David (2003): The Changing Structure of International Law: Sovereignty Transformed?In: Held, David; McGrew, Anthony (eds.): The Global Transformations Reader. An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Polity Press 2003, S. 162-176.
Henry, Peter Blair (2007): Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculation. Journal of Economic Literature, XLV, pp. 887-935.
Issing, Otmar (2008): Asset Prices and Monetary Policy. Cato Institute, 26th Annual Conference, 19 November 2008, available at .
Issing, Otmar (2003): Monetary stability, financial stability and the business cycle: five views. Bank for International Settlement, BIS Papers, No. 18, September 2003, available at .
Jackson, Robert (1999): Sovereignty in World Politics: a Glance at the Conceptual and Historical Landscape. Political Studies, XLVII, pp. 431-456.
Keynes, John Maynard (1933): National Self-Sufficiency, The Yale Review, Vol. 22, No. 4 (June), pp. 755-769.
Kiely, Ray (2007): Poverty reduction through Liberalization? Neoliberalism and the Myth of Global Convergence. Review of International Studies, No. 33, pp. 415-434.
Levinson, Marc (2010): Faulty Basel. Why More Diplomacy won’t keep the Financial System Safe. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 76-88.
Minsky, Hyman P. (1977): The Financial Instability Hypothesis: an Interpretation of Keynes and Alternative to “Standard” Theory. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 16, No 1, pp. 5-16.
Mishkin, Frederic S. (2007): Is financial globalization beneficial? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 39, No. 2/3, pp. 259-294.
Modenesi, André de Melo; Modenesi, Rui Lyrio (2008): Capital controls and Financial Liberalization: Removing the Ideological Bias. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 561-582.
Montiel; Peter; Reinhart, Carmen M. (1999): Do capital controls and macroeconomic policies influence the volume and composition of capital flows? Evidence from the 1990s, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 18, pp. 619-635.
Mundell, Robert (1963): Capital mobility and stabilization policy under fixed and flexible exchange rates. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, No. 29, pp. 475-485.
Obstfeld, Maurice; Shambaugh, Jay C.; Taylor, Alan M. (2005): The Trilemma in History: Tradeoffs among Exchange rates, Monetary Policies, and Capital Mobility. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 87, No. 3 (August), pp. 428-438.
Philpott, Daniel (1995): Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History. Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 353-368.
Reinhart, Carmen; Rogoff, Kenneth (2009): This Time is Different. Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rodrik, Dani; Subramanian, Arvind (2008): Why did Financial Globalization disappoint? Harvard University, Research Paper, March 2008, available at .
Schularick, Moritz; Taylor, Alan M. (2009): Credit booms gone bust: Monetary policy,leverage cycles and financial crises, 1870-2008. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 15512, November 2009.
Sheng, Li (2011): Theorizing free capital mobility: the perspective of developing countries. Review of International Studies, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 2519-2534.
S?rensen, Georg (1999): Sovereignty: Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution. Political Studies, XLVII, pp. 590-604.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2013): The Free-Trade Charade. Project Syndicate, 4 July 2013, available at .
Stiglitz, Josef E. (2004): Capital-Market Liberalization, Globalization , and the IMF, in: Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 20, No 1, pp. 57-71.
Tobin, James (1978): A Proposal for International Monetary Reform, Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 4, No. 3-4 (July/October 1978), pp. 153–159.
Warwick Commission (2007): The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward? The Report of the First Warwick Commission. Coventry 2007.
Warwick Commission (2009): International Financial Reform: In Praise of the Unlevel Playing Field. The Report of the Second Warwick Commission. Coventry 2009.
Wood, Christopher (1988): Boom and Bust. London: Sidgewick & Jackson
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1]尽管“三驾马车”制定了全面限制条款，希腊仍是以国层面行使至高无上权威的国家。2012年3月希腊违约事件爆发后，债券持有人对其原先的态度发生改变，开始充重新执行所谓的集体行动。当然，各主权国家仍是可单方面更改协约的一方。
[2] 丹尼尔·菲尔波特认为，虽然国家可能会接受一定的义务 - 无论在区域还是在??全球层面 - 基本当局不改变政策的监督和执行在国家一级（菲尔波特1995：368）。
[3]OECD《经济展望报告：89》。
[4]在金本位制度下，政治局面势必有所不同。那时工会不存在或影响力非常弱，决策者们更加自由根据外部经济状况设定利率。
[5]欲了解详细自由化影响的讨论，请参阅1997年Eatwell。
[6] 例子中的国家包括阿根廷、澳大利亚、比利时、巴西、加拿大、智利、丹麦、芬兰、法国、德国、大不列颠、希腊、意大利、日本、荷兰、挪威、葡萄牙、西班牙、瑞典、瑞士和美国，即120年中的领先国家。
[7] 当然，中国不允许向国外借贷，因此这是假设情况。现在，事实证据表明中国有3400万套住宅无人居住，这无疑构成房地产泡沫。关键是从伦敦到法兰克福，对繁荣的可持续性的评估将总是比对国内中央银行家和监管者的评估更难。
[8] 关于动机的详细讨论和关于特惠协议的缺点，请参考华威委员会的报告（2007年）第45页至第53页。
京公网安备 11010102001556号
已有0人发表了评论