老龄问题群体分析视角理论框架构建研究(6)

老龄问题群体分析视角理论框架构建研究(6)

核心提示:老年群体更替是我国人口老龄化发展中的必然现象,也是影响我国经济社会发展的重要因素。建立群体分析视角,充分发掘老年群体更替中的积极因素,实现人口老龄化与经济社会文化环境协调发展,正是本研究的主旨所在。

其四,在应对人口老龄化思路和政策构建中建立老年群体更替视角。虽然健康老龄化和积极老龄化的概念已耳熟能详,但在具体应对之策的设计中依然对老年群体参与发展的价值重视不足。群体分析视角提出完整的理论和指标构架,指出老年群体在更替中不断强化的能动性。这些对于构建符合积极老龄化理念的对策体系具有直接的推动作用。

总而言之,老年群体更替是我国人口老龄化发展中的必然现象,也是影响我国经济社会发展的重要因素。建立群体分析视角,充分发掘老年群体更替中的积极因素,实现人口老龄化与经济社会文化环境协调发展,正是本研究的主旨所在。

 参考文献:

[1]戴维·波普诺(美).李强等译.社会学(第十版).中国人民大学出版社,1999:173,325-355  David Popenoe. 1999. Sociology (10th Edition). Translated by Li Qiang. Beijing. China Renmin University Press: 173,325-335.

[2]刘铮.人口学辞典.北京:人民出版社,1986:229  Liu Zheng. 1986. Dictionary of Demography. Beijing: People's Press: 229.

[3]扎奥丁·萨德尔,艾沃纳·艾布拉姆斯(英).孙文龙译.视读混沌学.安徽文艺出版社,2007:10-32  Ziauddin Sardar and Iwona Abrams. 2007. Introducing Chaos: A Graphic Guide. Translated by Sun Wenlong. Anhui Literature and Art Publishing House: 10-32.

[4]李强,邓建伟,晓筝.社会变迁与个人发展:生命历程研究的范式与方法.社会学研究.1999;6:1-18  Li Qiang, Deng Jianwei and Xiao Zheng. 1999. Social Change and Individual Development: Paradigm and Method of the Life Course Theory. Sociological Studies 6:1-18.

[5]Bengtson, V.L. 1973. The Social Psychology of Aging. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill: 1-58.

[6]Christine L. Fry. 1999. Anthropological Theories of Age and Aging. In Vern L. Bengtson (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Ageing, New York: Springer Publishing Company: 271-286.

[7]Dale Dannefer. 1984. Adult Development and Social Theory: A Paradigmatic Reappraisal. American Sociological Review 1: 100-116.

[8]Date Dannefer. 1987. Aging as Intracohort Differentiation: Accentuation, Matthew Effect and the Life Course. Sociological Forum 2:211-236.

[9]Dennis Hogan. 1981. Transitions and Social Change: The Early Lives of American Men. New York: Academic Press: 90-122.

[10]Dennis Hogan. 1985. The Demography of Life-span Transitions: Temporal and Gender Comparisons. In A. S. Rossi(ed.), Gender and the Life Course. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall: 210-232.

[11]Elder, Glen H., Jr. 1969. Occupational Mobility, Life Patterns and Personality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 4:308-323.

[12]Elder, Glen. H.,Jr. and Liker, J. 1982. Hard Times in Women's lives: Historical Differences across 40 years. American Journal of Sociology 58: 241-269.

[13]Euel Elliott and L. Douglas Kiel. 1997. Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences: Foundations and Applications. Michigan, University of Michigan Press: 2-16.

[14]Gergen K.J. 1994. Realities and Relationships. Cambridge: Harvard University Press: 30-59.

[15]John C. Cavanaugh and Susan Krauss Whitbourne. 1999. Gerontology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press: 1-27.

[16]Kenneth J. Gergen and Mary M. Gergen. 2000. The New Ageing: Self-construction and Social Values. Social Structures and Aging. New York: Springer: 281-306.

[17]Krauss, Iseli. K. 1980. Between and Within Group Comparisons in Aging Research. In Pooh, Leonard W. (Ed), Ageing in the 1980s: Psychological Issues. Washington DC. US: American Psychological Association: 542-551.

[18]Maddox, G. and Douglass, E. R. 1974. Aging and Individual Difference: A Longitudinal Analysis of Social, Psychological Indicators. Journal of Gerontology 29: 555-563.

[19]Mary McCanney Gergen and Sara N. Davis. 1997. Toward a New Psychology of Gender. New York: Routledge: 3-15.

[20]Matilda White Riley, Anne Foner, John W. Riley, Jr. 1999. The Aging and Society Paradigm. In Vern L. Bengtson(eds. ), Handbook of Theories of Ageing. New York: Springer Publishing Company: 327-343.

[21]Modell, J., Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. and Strong, D. 1978. The Timing of Marriage in the Transition to Adulthood: Continuity and Change, 1860-1975. American Journal of Sociology 84: 8120-8150.

[22]Nancy R. Hooyman, H. Asuman. Kiyak. 2002. Social Gerontology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (Sixth Edition). Boston: Pearson Education Company: 255-272.

[23]Randy Hodson and Robert L. Kaufman. 1982. Economic Dualism: A Critical Review. American Sociological Review 6:727-739.

[24]Reigeluth C.M. 2004. Chaos Theory and the Sciences of Complexity: Foundations for Transforming Education. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA,2007

[25]Richard Adelman. 1985. Colloquium Presentation Ethel Percy Andrus Gerontology Centre. University of Southern California, November.

[26]Riley, M.W. 1973. Aging and Cohort Succession: Interpretations and Misinterpretations. Public Opinion Quarterly 1: 35-49.

[27]Seymour Spilerman. 1977. Careers, Labor Market Structure, and Socioeconomic Achievement. American Journal of Sociology 3: 551-593.

[28]Heinz Georg Schuster and Wolfram Just. 2005. Deterministic Chaos-An Introduction (Fourth, Revised and Enlarged Edition). Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: 1-6.

[29]Zuckerman, H. and Merton, R.K. 1972. Age, Aging, and Age Structure in Science. In M.W. Riley, M. Johnson and A. Foner, Aging and Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 292-356.

(作者简介:姚远,中国人民大学人口与发展研究中心教授;陈昫,武汉大学社会学系讲师)

责任编辑:叶其英校对:总编室最后修改:
0

精选专题

领航新时代

精选文章

精选视频

精选图片

微信公众平台:搜索“宣讲家”或扫描下面的二维码:
宣讲家微信公众平台
您也可以通过点击图标来访问官方微博或下载手机客户端:
微博
微博
客户端
客户端